Creative-scientific decision-making skills learning model for training creative thinking skills and student decision making skills

Asister Fernando Siagian; Muslimin Ibrahim; Zainul Arifin Imam Supardi

doi:10.55951/nurture.v17i1.141

Author(s)

Asister Fernando Siagian Surabaya State University, Surabaya, Indonesia

Muslimin Ibrahim Nahdlatul Ulama University,Surabaya,Indonesia

Zainul Arifin Imam Supardi Surabaya State University, Surabaya, Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to produce a valid learning model by validating the creativescientific decision -making skills (CSDMS) learning model to improve creative thinking skills and decision-making skills. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research methodology is development research adapted from Borg and Gall which consists of three stages: the preliminary stage, the model design stage and the model testing stage. This research is conducted through validation study designs those tests two criteria, namely content and construct validity by involving three experts in Focus Group Discussion (FGD) activities. The validity criteria were determined based on the Aiken validation index. Findings: The study's findings show that the CSDMS model is valid in terms of content and construct. This is based on calculations using the Aiken formula which shows that the V value for each instrument item is 0.89 = V = 1 with a very valid category. It was concluded that the CSDMS model was stated to be valid both in terms of content and construct validity in order to improve students' creative thinking skills and decision-making skills. Contribution to literature: This research produces a valid learning model in terms of content and construct, so that it can improve creative thinking skills and decision-making skills. The CSDMS model has a syntax consisting of six phases, namely: 1) Problem orientation 2) Exploration 3) Elaboration 4) Group investigation 5) Decision making and 6) Evaluation and reflection.

Publication Details

Page(s) 10-17

DOI 10.55951/nurture.v17i1.141

Published Journal: NURTURE, Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Year: 2023

Request the full text from PASTIC

Keywords

Construct validity, Content validity, Model creative-scientific decision making skills

References

Aiken L. R. .1980 .Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4) : 955-959.

Arends R. I.,Graw-Hill R. I. .2012 .Learning to teach. , : .

Baer J. .1993 .Creativity and divergent thinking: A task specific approach. , : .

Boehm R. G.,Webb B. .2002 .Skills handbook using social studies. Colombus OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.. , : .

Borg W. R.,Gall M. D. .2003 .. Educational research: An introduction (4th ed.), : .

Borich G. D. .1994 .Observation skills for effective teaching. , : .

Gravemeijer K.,Cobb P. .2006 .Design research from a learning design perspective. , : .

Herman H.,Shara A. M.,Silalahi T. F.,Sherly S.,Julyanthry J. .2022 .Teachers' Attitude towards Minimum Competency Assessment at Sultan Agung Senior High School in Pematangsiantar, Indonesia. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11 : 01-14.

Hu W.,Adey P. .2002 .A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4) : 389-403.

Joyce B.,Weil M.,Calhoun E. .2009 .Models of teaching (8th ed. , : .

Marzano R. J.,Waters T.,McNulty B. A. .1998 .Assosiation for Supervisions and Curriculum Development. , : .

Plomp N.,T. N. .2013 .Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development. , : .

Nieveen N.,McKenney S.,Akker V. D. .2006 .Educational design research. , : .

Plomp T.,Nieveen N. .2013 .Illustrative cases. , : .

T. J. ,Nieveen .2013 .-part-a.pdf.. , : 10-51.

Santrock. ,McGraw-Hill .2011 .Educational psychology (5th ed. , : .

Seechaliao T.,Natakuatoong O.,Wannasuphoprasit O. .2012 .The validation of an instructional design and development model based on engineering creative problem solving principless to develop creative thinking skills of undergraduate engineering students. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education and Management Innovation., : .