No Detail Found!

Breast Cancer Diagnostic Decisions from Multi-Source Data

Author(s)
Ling Xu Department of Ultrasound Imaging, Yichang Central People's Hospital,Yichang, Hubei,China
Xiangyun Zeng College of Mathematics and Physics, China Three Gorges University,Yichang, Hubei,China
Boyuan Xing Department of Ultrasound Imaging, Yichang Central People's Hospital,Yichang, Hubei,China
Abstract
To evaluate the e cacy of support vector machines (SVM) in diagnostic decisions on the benign or malignant nature of the ultrasound Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 breast nodules in a multi-source diagnostic context. Study Design: An experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Ultrasound Imaging, Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, China, from January 2020 to November 2023. Methodology: This study involved patients with ultrasound BI-RADS category 4 breast nodules. Conventional ultrasound diagnostics, S-Detect technology, and medical quasi-intelligent software were used to analyse the pre-treatment ultrasound results with pathological diagnoses serving as the reference standard for accuracy. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to extract the principal components from the multi-source breast imaging parameters, which were then integrated with SVM for evaluating its feasibility in classifying category 4 breast nodules as benign or malignant across various breast imaging modalities. Results: PCA extracts two principal components from a 12-dimensional feature parameter matrix measured from the multi-source breast imaging. The SVM, when combined with PCA, demonstrated a high level of reliability in multi-source breast cancer diagnostics, achieving a decision accuracy rate of 94.5%. Conclusion: The integration of SVM with PCA principal component analysis has proven to be highly valuable in the diagnostic decisionmaking process for the multi-source breast cancer diagnostics, o ering a robust method for distinguishing between benign and malignant category 4 breast nodules.
Publication Details
Page(s) 964-968
Published Journal: Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, Volume: 35, Issue: 08, Year: 2025

Request the full text from PASTIC

Keywords
Principal component analysis, Support Vector Machine, Breast imaging, Multi-source diagnostics
References
Bray F,Laversanne M,Sung H,Ferlay J,Siegel RL,Soerjomataram I .2024 .GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 10(3) : 229-63.
Allemani C,Matsuda T,Di Carlo V,Harewood R,Matz M,Niksic M .2018 .Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): Analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet, 6736(17) : 33326-3.
Castro SM,Tseytlin E,Medvedeva O,Mitchell K,Visweswaran S,Bekhuis T .2017 .Automated annotation and classi cation of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports. J Biomed Inform, 04 : 177-87.
Bartolotta TV,Orlando AAM,Spatafora L,Dimarco M,Gagliardo C .2020 .Taibbi A. S-Detect characterization of focal breast lesions according to the US BI RADS lexicon: A pictorial essay. J Ultrasound, 10(2) : 207-15.
Kim K,Song MK,Kim EK,Yoon JH. .2017 .Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: A study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist. Ultrasonography, 10(1) : 3-9.
Xing B,Chen X,Wang Y,Li S,Liang YK,Wang D .2022 .Evaluating breast ultrasound S-detect image analysis for small focal breast lesions. Front Oncol, 1030624 : 1030624.
Boyuan X,Xiaohui L,Yun Z,Jie P,Ling Z,Jie L .2021 .Ultrasonic elastography combined with breast imaging reporting and date system (BIRADS) classi cation indiagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer. Chin J Med Imag, 08(8) : 3289-7.
Wang X,Meng S. .2022 .Diagnostic accuracy of S-Detect to breast cancer on ultrasonography: A meta-analysis (PRISMA). Medicine (Baltimore), 10(34) : .
Witowski J,Heacock L,Reig B,K Kang S,Lewin A,Pysarenko K .2022 .Improving breast cancer diagnostics with deep learning for MRI. Sci Transl Med, 10(664) : .
Zhang J,Wu J,Zhou XS,Shi F,Shen D. . .Recent advancements in arti cial intelligence for breast cancer: Image augmentation, segmentation, diagnosis, and prognosis approaches. , : .
.2023 .. Semin Cancer Biol, 10 : 11-25.
Potnis KC,Ross JS,Aneja S,Gross CP,Richman IB .2022 .Arti cial intelligence in breast cancer screening: Evaluation of FDA device regulation and future recommendations. JAMA Intern Med, 4969(12) : 1306-12.
Li H,Cheng C,Wang Y,Qin H,Wang J,Zhang S .2021 .Combined diagnosis of ultrasonic elastography and BI-RADS classi cation increases diagnostic value in female patients with breast neoplasms. Am J Transl Res, 13(10) : 11758-63.
Shen Y,He J,Liu M,Hu J,Wan Y,Zhang T .2024 .Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and shear-wave elastography for small breast nodules. PeerJ, 10 : .
Sanmei J. [ .2024 .Application of breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) ultrasound grading in conjunction with ultrasound optical scattering imaging in the diagnosis of breast masses]. Prim Healthcare Med Forum, 02 : 1721.
Hamyoon H,Yee Chan W,Mohammadi A,Yusuf Kuzan T,Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari M,Leong WL .2022 .Arti cial intelligence, BI-RADS evaluation and morphometry: A novel combination to diagnose breast cancer using ultrasonography, results from multi-centre cohorts. Eur J Radiol, 110591 : 110591.
Sechopoulos I,Teuwen J,Mann R .2020 .Arti cial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: State of the art. Semin Cancer Biol, 06 : 214.
Polinati S,Bavirisetti DP,Rajesh KNVPS,Dhuli R .2022 .Multimodal medical image fusion based on content-based and PCA-sigmoid. Curr Med Imaging, 10(5) : 546-62.
Periyasamy S,Prakasarao A,Menaka M,Venkatraman B,Jayashree M. Support .2022 .vector machine based methodology for classi cation of thermal images pertaining to breast cancer. J Therm Biol, 103337 : 103337.
Xing B,Fu C .2024 .Yang Z. Diagnosis of benign and malignant breast nodules by conventional ultrasound in combination with S-Detect technology and elastic imaging. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 10(10) : 1154-7.
Jiang X,Chen C,Yao J,Wang L,Yang C,Li W .2025 .A nomogram for diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast nodules based on three-dimensional volume ultrasound. BMC Med Imaging, 10 : 48.
Gu Y,Tian J,Ran H,Ren W,Chang C,Yuan J .2025 .Ultrasound strain elastography to improve diagnostic performance of breast lesions by reclassifying BI-RADS 3 and 4a lesions: A multicentre diagnostic study. Br J Radiol, 10(1165) : 89-99.
0

Citations

0

Downloads

43

Views