No Detail Found!

Dealing with markedly elevated false positive D-dimer by sequential testing with two D-dimer assays.

Author(s)
Khawaja Afzal Ammar Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN Department of Internal Medicine, Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, MN, USA
Molly Shapiro Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN Department of Internal Medicine, Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, MN, USA
Abstract
False positive D-dimers are common & lead to an expensive confirmatory work-up. The approach of a highly sensitive assay for screening followed by a highly specific assay for confirmation, commonly used in diagnosing AIDS and Lyme disease, have not been applied to D-dimer testing. We describe a case of a 32-year old female with pleuritic chest pain and a D-dimer of >2000µg/l. Although negative chest CT and leg ultrasound for thromboembolism were performed, persistent pleuritic chest pain mandated further work-up. We used a confirmatory D-dimer assay with much higher specificity to declare the first test false positive. Such a negative confirmatory test can save further follow-up, work-up, and anxiety on both the parts of patient and physician, and should be considered in diagnostic algorithms of venous thromboembolism.
Publication Details
Page(s) 321-323
DOI DOI not available
Published Journal: Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, Volume: 24, Issue: 2, Year: 2008

Request the full text from PASTIC

0

Citations

0

Downloads

48

Views