No Detail Found!

Self-Directed Learning Vs Traditional Learning Self-Directed Learning versus Traditional Learning in Clinical Setting: A Study at Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology

Author(s)
Omar Zafar Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Abstract
Objective: To compare the outcome of self-directed learning to the traditional learning in terms of academic performance in clinical setting by using diabetic ocular fundus findings among fourth year MBBS students. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from May to Nov 2019. Methodology: After taking consent, data was collected from 50 students through multiple choice questions-based pre-test and post-test by non probability convenient sampling. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 22.0. Results: Out of total students, 28 (56%) students were male and 22(44%) were females. Mean age was 22.15±3.26 years. Both the groups showed improvement in their academic performance as p-value <0.001, but SDL group showed more improvement as compared to the traditional learning group. Conclusion: Self directed learning is better as compared to the traditional teaching as it promotes conceptual learning so it is important to work on this issue.
Publication Details
Page(s) 1212-1215
Published Journal: Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Volume: 73, Issue: 4, Year: 2023

Request the full text from PASTIC

Keywords
Self-directed Learning (SDL), Diabetic Ocular fundus, Traditional learning.
0

Citations

0

Downloads

89

Views