No Detail Found!

A randomized prospective comparative study between intrathecal chloroprocaine 1% and ropivacaine 0.5% for short duration surgery

Author(s)
Vivek Prakash Department of Anaesthesia, Teerthankar Mahaveer Medical College, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Payal Jain Department of Anaesthesia, Teerthankar Mahaveer Medical College, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Mukesh Kumar Prasad Department of Anaesthesia, Teerthankar Mahaveer Medical College, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Spinal anesthesia (SA) has recently seen a rapid surge in is popularity due to its edge over general anesthesia, being easier, cost-effective, lack of addictive drugs, reduced analgesic demand in the post anesthesia care unit, less nausea and vomiting within 24 h postoperatively, and a shorter hospital stay. Research continues regarding the best and the safest drug to be used for SA. We compared chloroprocaine 1% and ropivacaine 0.5% for SA in short duration surgery. Methodology: A total of 70 patient were enrolled and subdivided into two groups; Group R (35 patients), to receive 4 ml of 0.5 % ropivacaine (20 mg) and Group C (35 patients), to receive 4 ml of 1% chloroprocaine (40 mg). Hemodynamic parameters and block characteristics were compared between the two groups. Conclusion: This study shows that chloroprocaine 1% and ropivacaine 0.5% are equally effective in spinal anesthesia. However, chloroprocaine 1% is better suitable for shorter duration surgeries.
Publication Details
Page(s) 508-513
Published Journal: Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care, Volume: 27, Issue: 4, Year: 2023

Request the full text from PASTIC

Keywords
Ropivacaine, Hemodynamics, Block Characteristics, Chloroprocaine
0

Citations

0

Downloads

59

Views