No Detail Found!

Comparative Analysis of Supervised Classification Algorithms for Urban Sprawl Detection.

Author(s)
N. MINALLAH National Center for Big Data and Cloud Computing (NCBC), University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
W. KHAN National Center for Big Data and Cloud Computing (NCBC), University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
A. RASHID National Center for Big Data and Cloud Computing (NCBC), University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
M. N. KHAN National Center for Big Data and Cloud Computing (NCBC), University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
M. UZAIR National Center for Big Data and Cloud Computing (NCBC), University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
S. YOUSAF National Center for Big Data and Cloud Computing (NCBC), University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
N. AZIZ National Center for Big Data and Cloud Computing (NCBC), University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
Abstract
As Human population is increasing, a number of small towns are turning into big cities. But human race has developed itself i n technological terms smartly, which is helping human kind to act efficiently and consume the resources appropriately. Collection of urban sprawl statistics of an area has become efficient by using remote sensing. In comparison to the traditional methods, the new method of using remote sensing for the detection and classification of urban sprawl has substantially enhanced. Using this data management has become capable of taking suitable measures for its residents. This work compares six supervised classifiers, i.e Maximum Likelihood, Minimum Distance, Support Vector Machines, Mahalanobis, Parallelepiped and Feed Forward Neural Network for urban classification. The data used is of SPOT 5 and criteria for comparison of classifiers is based on accuracy. Due to the absence of blue band in SPOT imagery the collected data samples for training tend to be complex and overlapping. Training data collected and divided into 10 different samples, show 82.74% accuracy for Artificial Neural Network. In comparison with Artificial Neural Networks, the lowest recorded results are of parallelepiped Classifier.
Publication Details
Page(s) 389-398
DOI DOI not available
Published Journal: Sindh University Research Journal, Volume: 51, Issue: 3, Year: 2019

Request the full text from PASTIC

More from Sindh University Research Journal
0

Citations

0

Downloads

53

Views

Copyright ©  PASTIC National Center, Islamabad www.pastic.gov.pk