OBJECTIVES: To compare the global indices obtained by Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA)-Standard strategy with those obtained by SITA-Fast strategy using Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, in patients of glaucoma. STUDY DESIGN: Cross Sectional / Validative Study. PLACE AND DURATION: Armed Forces Institute of Opthalmology, between March and September 2010. METHODOLOGY: SITA Standard and SITA Fast visual field analysis of 184 patients were carried out on Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer (HFA-II) using white on white perimetry with 30-2 program on consecutive patients that fit the inclusion criteria, presenting to Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology (Rwp) between March 2010 and September 2010. Value of Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD), Mean Deviation (MD) and time taken to complete the examination were noted.. A p-value of 0.05 The mean PSD as calculated by the HFA-II, using the SITA Standard algorithm was 7.7 ± 4.4 dB, PSD using the SITA Fast algorithm was 7.5 ± 4.2 dB, with no significant difference between them, p≥0.05. It took 6:34 ± 2.1 minutes to complete the examination with the Fast strategy and 9.3±2.6 minutes with the Standard Strategy. The results were significant. CONCLUSION: SITA Fast strategy takes significantly less time to complete an examination with the same reliability as SITA Standard strategy.