Pakistan Science Abstracts
Article details & metrics
No Detail Found!!
The Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Phishing Attack Detection
Author(s):
1. Almina Sehrish: SZABIST University Gharo Campus Country: Pakistan
2. Muhammad Raza: SZABIST University, Gharo Campus, Pakistan
3. Muhammad Faizan Khan: IQRA University Country, Pakistan
4. Sabih Hida: SZABIST University Country Pakistan
5. Rageshwari Haryani: SZABIST University Country, Pakistan
Abstract:
Due to the internet's indispensable role in dayto-day operations, cybercrimes have increased dramatically, with phishing being a serious concern. Phishing attacks employ phony websites to obtain sensitive data and user passwords. Because hackers are always trying to change their strategies wisely, traditional preventative measures like software detection and user awareness frequently fall short. With their capacity for self-learning, machine learning-based solutions provide a more potent protection. Using a supervised learning framework, this paper offers a thorough review of machine learning techniques for phishing detection, making use of a dataset that has 87 attributes. Runtime, train accuracy, test accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score are used to assess the efficiency of various algorithms, such as Random Forest, Decision Trees, SVM, Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), XGBoost, Boosted Decision Tree, AdaBoost, Extra Trees, LightGBM, and CatBoost. With a 97.33% test accuracy as well as outstanding recall, precision, and F1-score, XGBoost stands out. Powerful performance is also demonstrated by Random Forest and LightGBM, demonstrating their effectiveness in identifying phishing attempts. This study feeds future research on optimization tactics and ensemble approaches to improve detection robustness and accuracy, and it gives cybersecurity professionals effective insights for better phishing detection.
Page(s): 22-30
DOI: DOI not available
Published: Journal: Journal of Information & Communication Technology (JICT), Volume: 18, Issue: 2, Year: 2024
Keywords:
Cybersecurity , Supervised Learning , URL Feature Extraction , Phishing Detection , Machine Algorithms
References:
[1] Ramana A.V.,Rao K.L.,Rao R.S. .2021 .StopPhish: an intelligent phishing detection method using feature selection ensemble. Social Network Anal. Mining, 11(1) : 1-9.
[2] . .. , : .
[3] K S ,B. .2023 .Review of the effectiveness of machine learning based. phishing prevention systems. 050006. 10.1063/5, : .
[4] Sameen .2020 ."PhishHaven-an efficient real-time ai phishing URLs detection system. " IEEE Access 8, : 83425-83443.
[5] Benavides E.,Fuertes W.,Sanchez S.,Sanchez M. .2019 .Classification of phishing attack solutions by employing Deep learning techniques: A Systematic literature review. In Smart innovation, systems and technologies, : .
[6] Asif A.U.Z.,Shirazi H.,Ray I.,Schieber S.,B S. .2023 .Security of Distributed Systems. SSS, (2) : 5.
[7] . .. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14310 : .
[8] Springer ,Alshammari S.,M. S. .2023 .Detecting phishing domains using machine learning. Applied Sciences, 13(8) : 4649.
[9] Rehman A,Javaid A.U.,Ali S.,Sheikh T.M.,Azeem J.A.,M. J.A.,Systematic Literature A .2021 .Review on Phishing and Anti-Phishing Techniques. , : .
[10] . .. , : .
[11] Safi A.,Singh S. .2023 .A systematic literature review on phishing website detection techniques. Journal of King, : .
[12] Computer ,Saud . .. Wa Almaʼlumat, 35(2) : 590-611.
[13] Zheng R.,Wu K.,Wu B.,Wang C.,X. C. .2023 .. , 01 : .
[14] .2021 .. Phishing Website Detection Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network and Random Forest Ensemble Learning. Sensors, 21(24) : 8281.
[15] Shams D. T.,Abohany M. Y.,ElKenawy A. A.,Thabet E. M.,M. E. M. .2023 .Machine learning techniques for detecting phishing URL attacks. , 75(1) : 1271-1290.
[16] Shikalgar S.,Sawarkar S. D.,Narwane S. .2023 .. , 036422 : .
[17] .2019 .Detection of URL based phishing attacks using machine learning. Int. J. Eng. Res. Tech., : .
[18] . .. (IJERT), 8(11) : .
[19] Su Y. .2020 .. Research on website phishing detection based on LSTM RNN. In 2020 IEEE 4th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), 1 : 284-288.
[20] A.A ,A. ,P. .2020 .Towards the Detection of Phishing Attacks. , : .
[21] Patil S.,Sreevalsan S.P.,Rahman A.,Saritha F.,A.N. F.,ICSTCEE F. .2020 .Phishing detection using random forest, SVM and neural network with backpropagation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Technologies in Computing, Electrical and Electronics, : 391-394.
[22] .2020 .. , 9277 : .
[23] Benavides-Astudillo E.,Fuertes W.,Nuñez-Agurto S.,RodríguezGalán D.,G. D. .2023 .A phishing-attack-detection model using Natural Language Processing and Deep Learning. Applied Sciences (Basel, 13(9) : 5275.
[24] Darabi V.,Izadi M. M.,M. M. M. .2020 .. , : .
[25] Amin U.A.,Aldabbas R.,Mughaid A.,Hnaif S.,Taamneh A.,Alnajjar S.,Elsoud A.,E. A. A. .2022 .An intelligent cyber security phishing detection system using deep learning techniques. Cluster Computing., 9 : 3043-3070.
[26] Singh S.,Beniwal H.,Part A .2021 .A survey on nearhuman conversational agents. J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci, 10(10) : 8866.
[27] .2021 .. A Comprehensive Survey on Identification and Analysis of Phishing Website based on Machine Learning Methods, 82 : 87.
[28] .2021 .. , 9431794 : .
[29] Fufan H. A. J.,Riskhan B.,Hussain K.,Jazri H. Bin,Alajmani S. H.,Sharma K. .2024 .SYN Flood Attack Detection and Prevention Technique (SFaDMT. 2024 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Networks and Computer Communications (ETNCC), : 1-9.
[30] Jazri Bin,Khan N. A.,Sharma K. .2024 .Detection of SYN Flood Attack Based on Bays Estimator (DsFaBe) in MANET,” in 2024 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Networks and Computer Communications (ETNCC). , : 1-5.
Citations
Citations are not available for this document.
0

Citations

0

Downloads

2

Views