Pakistan Science Abstracts
Article details & metrics
No Detail Found!!
All-seeing-access Sheath: a Novel Fluoroscopy-free Placement Technique in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.
Author(s):
1. Musa Ekici: Department of Urology, Hitit University Corum Research and Training Hospital, Corum, Turkey
2. Berat Cem Ozgur: Department of Urology, Urology Clinic, Ankara Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
3. Aykut Bugra Senturk: Department of Urology, Hitit University Corum Research and Training Hospital, Corum, Turkey
4. Arzu Akdagli Ekici: Department of Anesthesiology, Hitit University Corum Research and Training Hospital, Corum, Turkey
5. Cemil Aydin: Department of Urology, Hitit University Corum Research and Training Hospital, Corum, Turkey
6. Mehmet Murat Baykam: Department of Urology, Hitit University Corum Research and Training Hospital, Corum, Turkey
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of fluoroscopy-free RIRS (Retrograde intrarenal surgery) method in urolithiasis. Study Design: An observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Urology, Hitit University Corum Training and Research Hospital, Corum, Turkey, from October 2014 and October 2017. Methodology: Preoperative and postoperative data of 62 cases of renal calculi that underwent fluoroscopy-free RIRS procedure by a single surgeon were prospectively evaluated. All manipulations were performed with a novel technique; under direct vision during the operation. Fluoroscopy device was kept at hand in the operating room, but was not used. Results: The mean age was found as 51.73 ±12.63 (22-82) years. Fortyone patients (66.1%) were males and 21 (33.9%) were females. The mean size of stones were 19.29 ±7.64 (10-40) mm. The stone-free rate was calculated as 42 (67.7%) cases in a single session one month after the surgery, and 15 (24.2%) cases after the second session at the postoperative first month. A total of 57/61 (91.9%) patients were stone-free after the second procedure. No major intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed. As for the minor complications, one patient (1.6%) developed hematuria and four patients (6.5%) had fever. Conclusion: The described fluoroscopy-free RIRS procedure can be performed effectively and safely in patients diagnosed with renal calculi, by endourologists.
Page(s): 263-267
DOI: DOI not available
Published: Journal: Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP, Volume: 29, Issue: 3, Year: 2019
Keywords:
Keywords are not available for this article.
References:
[1] BredaA,TerritoA,Lopez-MartinezJM, 2016.Benefits and risks of ureteral access sheaths for retrograde renal access,Curr Opin Urol 26 70 -5
[2] MertogluC,BozkurtA,KeskinE,GunayM, 2018.Evaluation of the effect of retrograde intrarenal surgery with myo-Inositol oxygenase,Pak J Med Sci 34 170 -174
[3] HsiRS,HarperJD, 2013.Fluoroless ureteroscopy: zero-dose fluoroscopy during ureteroscopic treatment of urinary-tract calculi,J Endourol 27 432 -7
[4] GreeneDJ,TenggadjajaCF,BowmanRJ,AgarwalG,EbrahimiKY,BaldwinDD, 2011.Comparison of a reduced radiation fluoroscopy protocol to conventional fluoroscopy during uncomplicated ureteroscopy,Urology 78 286 -90
[5] BrisbaneW,SmithD,SchlaiferA,AndersonK,BaldwinDD, 2012.Fluoroless ureteral stent placement following uncomplicated ureteroscopic stone removal: a feasibility study,Urology 80 766 -70
[6] MogilevkinY,SoferM,MargelD,GreensteinA,LifshitzD, 2014.Predicting an effective ureteral access sheath insertion: A bicenter prospective study,J Endourol 28 1414 -7
[7] TraxerO,ThomasA, 2013.Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from the insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intra-renal surgery,J Urol 189 580 -4
[8] GeavleteP,MultescuR,GeavleteB, 2011.Health policy: Reducing radiation exposure time for ureteroscopic procedures,Nat Rev Urol 8 478 -9
[9] BoulalasI,De DominicisM,Defidio L, 2018.Semirigid ureteroscopy prior retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) helps to select the right ureteral access sheath,Arch Ital Urol Androl 90 20 -24
[10] GoldbergH,GolombD,ShtabholtzY,TapieroS,CreidermanG,SharivA, 2017.The "old" 15 mm renal stone size limit for RIRS remains a clinically significant threshold size,World J Urol 35 1947 -54
[11] HeinS,SchoenthalerM,WilhelmK,SchlagerD,VachW,WetterauerU, 2017.Ultra-low radiation exposure during flexible ureteroscopy in patients with nephrolithiasis - How far can we go?,Urology 108 34 -9
[12] SfoungaristosS,LorberA,GofritON,YutkinV,LandauEH,PodeD, 2015.Surgical experience gained during an endourology fellowship program may affect fluoroscopy time during ureterorenoscopy,Urolithiasis 43 369 -74
[13] YeciesT,AverchTD,Semins MJ, 2018.Identifying and managing the risks of medical ionizing radiation in endourology,Can J Urol 25 9154 -60
[14] MandhaniA,ChaudhuryH,GuptaN,SinghHK,KapoorR,KumarA, 2007.Is fluoroscopy essential for retrieval of low ureteric stones?,Urol Int 78 70 -2
[15] KiracM,TepelerA,GuneriC,KalkanS,KardasS,ArmaganA, 2014.Reduced radiation fluoroscopy protocol during retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney stones,Urol J 11 1589 -94
[16] PengY,XuB,ZhangW,LiL,LiuM,GaoX, 2015.Retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones: Is fluoroscopy-free technique achievable,Urolithiasis 43 265 -70
[17] MultescuR,GeavleteB,GeorgescuD,GeavleteP, 2014.Improved durability of flex-Xc digital flexible ureteroscope: How long can you expect it to last?,Urology 84 32 -5
[18] DefidoL,De dominicisM,Di gian FrancescoL,FuchsG,PatelA, 2012.Improving flexible ureterorenoscope durabilitiy up to 100 procedures,J Endourol 26 1329 -34
[19] OguzU,BalciM,AtisG,BozkurtOF,TuncelA,HalisF, 2014.Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with isolated anomaly of kidney rotation,Urolithiasis 42 141 -7
Citations
Citations are not available for this document.
0

Citations

0

Downloads

3

Views