Pakistan Science Abstracts
Article details & metrics
No Detail Found!!
A comparative study of Type-I underlay tympanoplasty using tragal cartilage versus temporalis fascia graft
Author(s):
1. Umair Ishfaq: Department of ENT, Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan
2. Sadia Chaudhry: Department of ENT, Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan
3. Mahwash Umair: Department of ENT, Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan
4. Ashar Alamgir: Department of ENT, Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan
5. Wajid Hussain: Department of Medicine, FUIC, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
6. Muhammad Saleem: Aziz Fatima Medical College, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Abstract:
Objective: To compare effectiveness of graft uptake between tragal cartilage and temporal fascia in patients undergoing Type-I underlay tympanoplasty. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in ENT Department, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi from 20th Feb to 19th August 2019. A total of 80 patients of both genders aged between 20 - 40 years were divided randomly into two groups. Non-probability consecutive sampling was used. Tragal cartilage Type-I underlay Tympanoplasty was performed on Group-A, while Group-B underwent temporalis fascia Type-I underlay Tympanoplasty. Results: Out of 80 patients, 42 (52.5%) were men and 38 (47.5%) women. Mean age was 29.41 ± 5.75 years. Mean duration of symptoms ranged from 7.03 ± 3.74 years. Perforation was = 25% in 44 (55.0%) patients while 25 – 50% and > 50% in 19 (23.8%) and 17 (21.2%) patients, respectively. The effectiveness was significantly higher in patients undergoing Tragal cartilage Type-I underlay Tympanoplasty (100.0% vs. 72.5%; p = 0.000) as compared to temporalis fascia Type-I underlay Tympanoplasty. Same difference was observed across all age, gender, duration of symptoms and size of perforation groups. Conclusion:  Tragal cartilage Type-I underlay Tympanoplasty was more effective (100.0% vs. 72.5%; p = 0.000) as compared to Temporalis fascia Type-I underlay Tympanoplasty regardless of patient’s age, gender, duration of symptoms and size of perforation. 
Page(s): 735-738
DOI: DOI not available
Published: Journal: Rawal Medical Journal, Volume: 48, Issue: 3, Year: 2023
Keywords:
tragal cartilage , temporalis fascia , TypeI underlay tympanoplasty
References:
[1] Freitas MR,Oliveira TC .2014 .The role of different types of grafts in tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 80 : 275-6.
[2] Yegin Y,Celi M,Koc AK .2016 .Comparison of temporalis fascia muscle and full-thickness cartilage grafts in type 1 pediatric tympanoplasties. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 8694 : 311-8.
[3] Catli T,Celik C,Demir E,Gur H .2015 .Investigation of myringosclerosis development in different grafting materials after myringo-/tympanoplasty. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg, 25 : 65-9.
[4] Abdelhameed W,Rezk I,Awad A .2017 .Impact of cartilage graft size on success of tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 83 : 507-11.
[5] Demirpehlivan IA,Onal K,Arslanoglu S,Songu M,Ciger E,Can N. .2011 .Comparison of different tymapanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 268 : 471-4.
[6] Kim JY,Oh JH,Lee HH .2012 .Fascia versus cartilage graft in type I tympanoplasty: audiological outcome. J Craniofac Surg, 23 : 605-8.
[7] Friedman AB,Gluth MB,Moore PC,Dornhoffer JL .2013 .Outcomes of cartilage tympanoplasty in the pediatric population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 148 : 297-301.
[8] Onal K,Arslanoglu S,Songu M,Demiray U,Demirpehlivan IA .2012 .Functional results of temporalis fascia versus cartilage tympanoplasty in patients with bilateral chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol, 126 : 22-5.
[9] Chouhan A,Singh BK,Verma PC .2015 .Role of cartilage as a graft material for tympanic membrane and in middle ear reconstruction. Int J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 4 : 66-72.
[10] Yurttas V,Yakut F,Kutluhan A,Bozdemir K. .2014 .Preparation and placement of cartilage island graft in tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 80 : 522-6.
[11] Övet G,Alataş N,Şentürk M .2016 .Pediatric type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty: comparison between graft success rates and hearing results in adults. J Int Adv Otol, 12 : 257-60.
[12] Shishegar M,Faramarzi A,Taraghi A .2012 .A short-term comparison between result of palisade cartilage tympanoplasty and temporalis fascia technique. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol, 24 : 105-12.
[13] Abdelghany AM .2013 .The button graft technique for perforations affecting less than 25% of the tympanic membrane: a non-randomised comparison of a new modification to cartilage tympanoplasty with underlay and overlay grafts. Clin Otolaryngol, 38 : 208-16.
[14] Khalilullah S,Shah SP,Yadav D,Shrivastav RP,Bhattarai H .2016 .Comparison of results of graft uptake using tragal cartilage perichondrium composite graft versus temporalis fascia in patients undergoing surgery for chronic otitis media - squamous type. Head Face Med, 12 : 26-9.
[15] Singh R,Kundu S,Sarkar S,Ghosh B,Mukhopadhyay S .2013 .Comparative study of endoscopic temporalis fascia versus endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty. Bengal J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 21 : 16-7.
[16] Ozbek C,Ciftçi O,Tuna EE,Yazkan O,Ozdem C. .2008 .A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol, 29 : 679-83.
[17] Vadiya S,Parikh V,Shah S,Pandya P,Kansara A .2016 .Comparison of modified cartilage shield tympanoplasty with tympanoplasty using temporalis fascia only: retrospective analysis of 142 cases. Scientifica, : 809-813.
[18] Yegin Y,Celik M,Koc AK,Küfeciler L,Elbistanlı MS,Kayhan FT .2016 .Comparison of temporalis fascia muscle and full-thickness cartilage grafts in type 1 pediatric tympanoplasties. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 82 : 695-701.
[19] Jalali MM,Motasaddi M,Kouhi A,Dabiri S,Soleimani R .2017 .Comparison of cartilage with temporalis fascia tympanoplasty: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Laryngoscope, 127 : 2139-48.
Citations
Citations are not available for this document.
0

Citations

0

Downloads

4

Views