Aesthetically Characterized Ocular Prosthesis. | [Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP • 2018]

Author(s):

1. RahulS Kulkarni: Department of Prosthodontics, Kulkarni Dental Clinic, Community Hall Complex, Tilak Nagar, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

2. Poonam Kulkarni: Department of Prosthodontics, Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

3. RupalJ Shah: Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

4. Bharti Tomar: Department of Prosthodontics, The Healers Dental Group, Delhi-95, India

Abstract:

Loss of eye has immense intimidating impact on social life of a patient. Ocular prosthesis can be stock prosthesis, or it can be customized according to the patient's socket tissue bed and his/her individualized aesthetic requirements. There are many methods of improving aesthetics of the ocular prosthesis, from painting the sclera and iris, use of transparent grids for proper orientation up to the use of digital photographic image of contra-lateral normal eye. Present case report demonstrates a new method of enhancing the aesthetics of an eye prosthesis using silk fibers which are easily available.

Page(s): 476-478

DOI: DOI not available

Published: Journal: Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP, Volume: 28, Issue: 6, Year: 2018

Keywords:

Keywords are not available for this article.

References:

[1] KitzmannAS,WeaverAL,LohseCM,BuettnerH,SalomaoDR, 2003.Clinicopathologic correlations in 646 consecutive surgical eye specimens,,Am J Clin Pathol 119 594 -601

[2] LubkinV,SloanS. Enucleation, 1990.and psychic trauma,Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 8 259 -62

[3] GuttalSS,JoshiSM,PillaiLK,NadigerRK, 2011.Gerodontology. ocular prosthesis for a geriatric patient with customised iris: A report of two cases,Gerodontology 28 152 -6

[4] ErpfSF, 1953.Comparative features of plastic and/or glass in artificial-eye construction,Arch Ophthalmol 50 737 -

[5] WeldenRB,NiiranenJV, 1956.Ocular prosthesis,J Prosthet Dent 6 272 -8

[6] Taylor, 2000.Clinical maxillofacial prosthetics, 233 -76

[7] BeumerJ,CurtisTA,MarunickMT, 1996.Maxillofacial rehabilitation: prosthodontic and surgical considerations,Ishiyaku EuroAmerica 377 -453

[8] ArcuriMR,LaVelleWE,FylerE,JonsR, 1993.Prosthetic complications of extraoral implants,J Prosthet Dent 69 289 -92

[9] ParelSM, 1980.Diminishing dependence on adhesives for retention of facial prosthesis,J Prosthet Dent 43 552 -560

[10] PrithvirajDR,GuptaV,MuleyN,SureshP, 2013.Custom ocular prosthesis: Comparison of two different techniques,J Prosthodont Res 57 129 -34

Citations

Downloads

Views