Pakistan Science Abstracts
Article details & metrics
No Detail Found!!
A prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the effects of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl on Attenuation of Pressor Response during Laryngoscopy and Intubation.
Author(s):
1. Baikady Vasudevarao Sunil: Department of Anesthesiology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, India
2. Neeta Santha: Department of Anesthesiology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, India
Abstract:
Background: Conduct of general anesthesia requires an ideal premedication and induction agent. Adequate premedication blunts the laryngoscopy and intubation response efectively, which is required in specific groups of people like cardiac patients, hypertensive patients and patients with raised intracranial tension. Our study examines the efectiveness of two drugs, fentanyl and dexmedetomidine in blunting these responses. Objectives: Dexmedetomidine and fentanyl are known for their analgesic and sedative properties. However, there are not suficient data comparing the two drugs as premedication agents .In the present study we compared the hemodynamic effects of a single pre induction dose of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine on laryngoscopy and intubation. Methodology: Sixty ASA I-II patients were randomized into two groups; Group D (dexmedetomidine group) received 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine and Group F (fentanyl group) received 2 µg/kg fentanyl intravenously over ten min. The parameters measured included mean arterial pressure, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure at specified time intervals. The statistical methods used in this study were chi square test and Students unpaired “t” test. Results: Dexmedetomidine was found superior to fentanyl in blunting the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and intubation. There was statistically significant diference in heart rate in dexmedetomidine group compared to fentanyl group. The heart rate in group D was 62 ± 47 per min and in group F 76 ± 23 per min, ten minutes post drug administration. Statistically significant diferences were also noted in heart rate within one minute after laryngoscopy with Group D (82 ± 13) having a lower value compared to group F (90 ± 50) and also at ten minutes after laryngoscopy and intubation, Group D (63.1 ± 8.70 per min) and Group F (75.07 ± 13.23 per min). Three patients in Group D had bradycardia and had to be supplemented with 0.6 mg atropine. There was no tsatistically significant diferences in mean arterial pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Conclusion: We conclude that dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) is superior to fentanyl (2 µg/kg) as premedication agent in supressing cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and intubation.
Page(s): 62-66
DOI: DOI not available
Published: Journal: Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care, Volume: 22, Issue: 1, Year: 2018
Keywords:
Keywords are not available for this article.
References:
[1] AnesthAnalg, 2000., 90 834 -9
[2] ., 18 412 -8
[3] 2015., 5 127 -131
[4] BajwaSJ1,KaurJ,SinghA, ., -
[5] JAnaesth, 2012., 56 123 -8
[6] .,doi: 10 96303 -5049
[7] 2008., 52 519 -
[8] 2012.intensive care,Rev Bras Anestesiol 7094 70110 -1
[9] BajwaS,KulshresthaA, 2013.Dexmedetomidine: An adjuvant making large inroads into clinical practice,doi: 1 0 . 4 1 0 3 / 2 1 4 1 - 9 2 4 8 . 1 2 2 0 4 4 475 -83
[10] PhilipW,PengH., 1999.A review of the use of fentanyl analgesia in the management of acute pain in adults,Anesthesiology 90 576 -599
[11] MondalS,GhoshS,BhattacharyaS,ChoudhuryB,MallickS,PrasadA, 2015.Comparison between dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on intubation conditions during awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A randomized double blinded prospective study,J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 10 155151 -9185
[12] NerminG,BelginA,NurtenS,MustafaB., 2014.The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of hemodynamic response to intubation,Rev Bras Anestesiol 64 314 -
[13] KumariK,GombarS,KapoorD,SandhuHS, 2015.Clinical study to evaluate the role of preoperative dexmedetomidine in attenuation of hemodynamic response to direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation,Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 09 123 -30
[14] GulabaniM,GurhaP,DassP,KulshreshthaN., 2015.Comparative analysis of efficacy of lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg and two different doses of dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg and 1 μg/kg) in attenuating the hemodynamic pressure response to laryngoscopy and intubation,Anesth Essays Res 10 150167 -1162
[15] BajwaSJ,KaurJ,SinghA,ParmarS,SinghG,KulshresthaA, 2012.Attenuation of pressor response and dose sparing of opioids and anaesthetics with pre-operative dexmedetomidine,Indian J Anaesth 10 96303 -5049
[16] MahmoudM,MasonKP, 2015.Dexmedetomidine: review, update, and future considerations of paediatric perioperative and periprocedural applications and limitations Br J Anaesth, 10 171 -82
[17] NaazS,OzairE., 2014.Dexmedetomidine in Current Anaesthesia Practice- a review,J Clin Diagn Res 10 GE01 -4
Citations
Citations are not available for this document.
0

Citations

0

Downloads

2

Views