Pakistan Science Abstracts
Article details & metrics
No Detail Found!!
The efficacy of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin versus Tamsulosin alone in double-J stent associated with lower urinary tract symptoms.
Author(s):
1. Asad Ullah Jan Hafiz: DHQ Teaching Hospital, Charsadda-Pakistan.
2. Syed Wajid Ali: Muhammad Medical College, MirpurKhas-Pakistan.
3. Sana Khalid: Bahria University Medical and Dental College, Karachi-Pakistan.
Abstract:
Background: Lithotripsy procedures, especially, Ureterorenoscopy is considered instrumental in treating ureteral stones effectively. In endourological surgery, a pigtail ureteric stent is a widely used method to resolve or prevent ureteral obstruction, promote healing, and reduce the incidence of ureteral strictures. The current study aimed to compare the efficacy of Tamsulosin with Solifenacin and Tamsulosin alone in doubleJ stents associated with lower urinary tract symptoms using IPS-Score. Methodology: This study was conducted at the Urology Department, Institute of Kidney Diseases (IKD) Peshawar, Pakistan, from Aug 30, 2018, to Feb 28, 2019. Patients with DJ stents were randomly assigned to two groups (Group A & B). Group A received Tab Tamsulosin and Solifenacin, while Group B received Tab Tamsulosin alone; the IPS score was calculated at baseline and after 14 days. Results: A total of 100 subjects undergoing unilateral DJ ureteral stenting participated in this study. The post-treatment IPSS Irritative score suggested that Group A has an average IPS score of 4.38±1.77, while in Group B, 6.4±1.55, which was significant with a p-value of 0.000. Conclusion: Post-treatment average IPSS Irritative score of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin combination was less than Tamsulosin alone in patients with unilateral DJ stent.
Page(s): 313-318
Published: Journal: International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research, Volume: 10, Issue: 3, Year: 2022
Keywords:
Tamsulosin , Ureterorenoscopy , DoubleJ Stent , urinary tract infections , Solifenacin
References:
References are not available for this document.
Citations
Citations are not available for this document.
0

Citations

0

Downloads

5

Views