Pakistan Science Abstracts
Article details & metrics
No Detail Found!!
Validation of Course Interest Survey Tool in Mbbs Students of a Private Medical College of Pakistan.
Author(s):
1. Tabassum Naveed: Department of Medical Education HITEC-Institute of Medical Sciences, Taxila Cantt, Pakistan
2. Naveed Mazhar Bhatti: Department of Orthodontics HITEC-Institute of Medical Sciences Dental College, Taxila Cantt, Pakistan
Abstract:
Objective: The study was conducted to determine the reliability and validity of Course Interest Survey tool to measure motivation of MBBS students in Pakistan. Study Design: Quantitative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at Women Medical College Abbottabad, from 17th October 2014 to 30th August 2015. Materials and Methods: Simple random sampling by lottery method was used to collect data from three hundred students. Each student from all five years of MBBS was assigned a numerical number. The numbers were written on a piece of paper and placed in a box and mixed. A researcher blinded to the procedure randomly selected the required number of students. Course interest survey form was distributed to the randomly selected students at the end of term and data was collected. Ethical approval of the study was received. Reliability was determined by Cronbach's alpha, and validity of the tool was determined by factor analysis on IBM SPSS software version 22. Results: All the students were females between the ages of eighteen and twenty-four years. The participants had diverse cultural background. The Cronbach's alpha for the CIS scale and its subscales Attention, Relevance, Confidence and Satisfaction were a=0.86, 0.75, 0.75, 0.24 and 0.69 respectively. The overall Kaiser-MeyerOlkin was 0.88. Factor Analysis with varimax rotation revealed four components explaining 51% of the total variance. Conclusion: Course interest Survey is a reliable and a valid tool to measure motivation of MBBS students in a private medical college of Pakistan. Results of Women Medical College cannot be generalized to all the medical colleges.
Page(s): 201-207
DOI: DOI not available
Published: Journal: Journal of Islamic International Medical College, Volume: 12, Issue: 4, Year: 2017
Keywords:
Keywords are not available for this article.
References:
[1] HuA,ShewokisPA,TingK,FungK., 2016.Motivation in computerassisted instruction,Laryngoscope 126 S5 -S13
[2] 2010.Motivational design for learning and performance,The ARCS model approach -
[3] BjornebekkG,DisethA,UlriksenR, 2013.Achievement motives, self-efficacy, achievement goals, and academic achievement at multiple stages of education: a longitudinal analysis,Psychol Rep 112 771 -87
[4] GarriottPO,HudymaA,KeeneC,Santiago D, 2015.Social cognitive predictors of first- and non-first-generation college students' academic and life satisfaction,J Couns Psychol 62 253 -63
[5] LoorbachNR,PetersO,KarremanJ, 2015.Validation of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) in a selfdirected instructional setting aimed at working with technology,Br J Educ Technol 46 204 -18
[6] SchlierB,EngelM,FladungAK,FritzscheA,LincolnTM, 2017.The relevance of goal-orientation for motivation in high versus low proneness to negative symptoms,J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 55 113 -20
[7] ChantornC,Vatcharaporn E. Enhancing, 2013.The international review of research in open and distributed learning, 14 377 -401
[8] IshiguroK,MajimaY., 2016.Utilization of Communication Robot in Patient Education,Stud Health Technol Inform 225 913 -4
[9] PettMA,LackeyNR,SullivanJJ, 2003.Making sense of factor analysis: the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research, -
[10] EimanM,MeguidA,KhalilMK, 2017.Measuring medical students' motivation to learning anatomy by cadaveric dissection,Anatomical Sciences Education 10 363 -71
[11] CortrightRN,LujanHL,BlumbergAJ,CoxJH,DiCarloSE, 2013.Higher levels of intrinsic motivation are related to higher levels of class performance for male but not female students,Adv Physiol Educ 37 227 -32
[12] PhillipsCV,LaPoleLM, 2003.Quantifying errors without random sampling,BMC Med Res Methodol 3 9 -
[13] BruningRH,SchrawGJ,NorbyMM, 2011.Cognitive Psychology and instruction,5th edition. Pearson -
[14] DohnNB,FagoA,OvergaardJ,MadsenPT, 2016.Students' motivation toward laboratory work in physiology teaching,Adv Physiol Educ 40 313 -8
[15] KusurkarRA,CroisetG, 2015.Self-determination theory and scaffolding applied to medical education as a continuum,Acad Med 90 1431 -
[16] KhanAS,CanseverZ,AvsarUZ,AcemogluH, 2013.Perceived selfefficacy and academic performance of medical students,J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 23 495 -8
[17] SchunkDH,MeeceJR,PintrichPR,Applications, 2014., -
[18] GordonJ,WoodD, .ABC of teaching and learning in medicine, 22 -4
[19] MoirF,HenningM,HassedC,MoyesSA,ElleyCR, 2016.A PeerSupport and Mindfulness Program to Improve the Mental Health of Medical Students,Teach Learn Med 28 293 -302
[20] TuranS,ValckeM,De MaeseneerJ,AperL,KooleS,De WispelaereC, 2013.A novel Medical Achievement Selfefficacy Scale (MASS): a valid and reliable tool, 35 575 -80
[21] DemirorenM,TuranS,OztunaD, 2016.Medical students' selfefficacy in problem-based learning and its relationship with self-regulated learning,Med Educ Online 21 30049 -
[22] KusurkarR,CateOT, 2013.Education Is Not Filling a Bucket, but Lighting a Fire: Self-Determination Theory and Motivation in Medical Students,Academic Medicine 88 904 -
[23] EscherC,CreutzfeldtJ,MeurlingL,HedmanL,KjellinA,Feellander-Tsai L, 2017.Medical students' situational motivation to participate in simulation based team training is predicted by attitudes to patient safety,BMC Med Educ 17 1 -7
[24] St-OngeC,YoungM,EvaKW,HodgesB, 2016.Validity: one word with a plurality of meanings,Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 20 481 -6
Citations
Citations are not available for this document.
0

Citations

0

Downloads

16

Views