Pakistan Science Abstracts
Article details & metrics
No Detail Found!!
The incidence of post amputation syndrome after pericapsular nerve group block versus sciatico-femoral nerve block in patients undergoing above knee amputation
Author(s):
1. Ahmed Hussein Mohamed Hussein Bakeer: National Cancer Institute Cairo Egypt
2. Ahmed Ibrahim Hussien Hussien: Nasser Institute for Research & Treatment, Cairo, Egypt
3. Somaya Mohamed Abd El Aziz El Shaikh: National Cancer Institute Cairo Egypt,
4. Ahmed Mohamed Soliman Idris: National Cancer Institute Cairo Egypt,
Abstract:
Background & objective: Regional anesthesia for orthopedic procedures has been widely practiced around the globe, and it has been employed either alone or in combination with general anesthesia. An above knee amputation will need blockade of both femoral and sciatic nerves for successful pain control and help with peripheral sensitization for the patient. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel regional nerve block to provide analgesia in fractured hip patients. We assessed the effectiveness of this block compared to sciatico-femoral block and the incidence of post amputation syndrome in patients undergoing above knee amputation. Methodology: This randomized controlled single-blinded study was carried out on 30 patients with lower limb bone tumors indicated for above knee amputation admitted to surgery clinic, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. The duration of study was from January 2021 to May 2022. Patients were randomized equally using opaque sealed envelopes into 2 groups Group A: (n = 15) pericapsular nerve group block group (PNGB) to receive 20 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine with 4 mg dexamethasone at the pubic ramus just medial to the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS). Group B: (n = 15) patients received sciatico-femoral block with a mixture of 20 mL 0.125% bupivacaine with 4 mg dexamethasone injected in the femoral and sciatic nerve. Postoperative VAS scores, the time to first analgesic request was and the total morphine consumed as rescue analgesic were recorded. Results: Time to first analgesic request was significantly prolonged in group B than group A (P < 0.001). Total morphine dose in first 24 h postoperative and in first 48 h postoperative were significantly lower in group B than in group A (P < 0.001 and 0.003 respectively). VAS scores were significantly lower at 2, 4 and 8 h in group B than group A (P < 0.05) and were insignificantly different at 12, 24 h, and on 2nd and 7th day between the two groups. Phantom limb syndrome frequency was significantly lower at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months in group B than in group A (P < 0.05); at 6 mo it was noted in 10 (66.67%) patients in group A and 4 (26.67%) in group B with 2.5 (1:6.23) RR (95% CI) (P = 0.028). Conclusions: Sciatico-femoral block has better outcomes than pericapsular nerve block in patients undergoing above knee amputation regarding analgesic effect and the development of phantom limb syndrome. Abbreviations: AIIS - Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine; PNGB - Pericapsular Nerve Group Block; PLP - Phantom Limb Pain; SFB - Sciatic-Femoral Nerve Block; VAS - Visual Analog Scale
Page(s): 665-672
Published: Journal: Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care, Volume: 27, Issue: 6, Year: 2023
Keywords:
Post Amputation Syndrome , Peri Capsular Nerve Group Block , Sciaticofemoral Nerve Block , Above Knee Amputation
References:
[1] Glaser JD,Bensley RP,Hurks R,Dahlberg S,Hamdan AD,Wyers MC .2013 .Fate of the contralateral limb after lower extremity amputation. J Vasc SurgCases, 58(6) : 1571-77.
[2] Hawamdeh ZM,Othman YS,Ibrahim AI YS .2008 .Assessment of anxiety and depression after lower limb amputation in Jordanian patients. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 4(3) : 627-33.
[3] Cohen Hsu E,SP. Hsu E .2013 .Postamputation pain: epidemiology, mechanisms, and treatment. J Pain Res, 6 : 121-36.
[4] .1983 .Results of a trial survey. Am J Phys Med, 62(5) : 227-38.
[5] Kooijman CM,Dijkstra PU,Geertzen JHB,Elzinga A,van der Schans CP .2000 .Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study. Pain, 87(1) : 33-41.
[6] Flor H,Nikolajsen L,Staehelin Jensen T. L .2006 .Phantom limb pain: a case of maladaptive CNS plasticity? Nat Rev Neurosci. , 7(11) : 873-81.
[7] Srivastava D. Chronic .2017 .-amputation pain: peri-operative management - Review. Br J Pain, 11(4) : 192-202.
[8] Ayling O,Montbriand J,Jiang J,Ladak S,Love L,Eisenberg N,Reduces Opioid Requirement Following Major Lower Limb Amputation. J Vasc SurgCases N .2014 .Continuous Regional Anesthesia Provides Effective Pain Management. , 60 : 123-30.
[9] Bosanquet DC,Glasbey JC,Stimpson A,Williams IM,Twine CP IM .2015 .Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of perineural local anaesthetic catheters after major lower limb amputation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 50(2) : 241-9.
[10] Girón-Arango L,Peng PWH,Chin KJ,Brull R,Perlas A.,Pericapsular Nerve A. .2018 .Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 43(8) : 859-63.
[11] Ashwin A,Shankar K,Rangalakshmi S. KOPS AWARD ABSTRACTS: PAIN. Indian J Anaesth K .2020 .. , 64 : 35-40.
[12] Ahiskalioglu A,Aydin ME,Ahiskalioglu EO,Tuncer K,Celik M. .2020 .Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for surgical anesthesia of medial thigh. J Clin Anesth, 59 : 42-3.
[13] Bilal B,Öksüz G,Boran Ö F,Topak D,Doğar F D .2020 .High volume pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for acetabular fracture surgery: A new horizon for novel block. J Clin Anesth, 62 : 109.
[14] Ueshima H,Otake H. RETRACTED H .2019 .: Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is effective for dislocation of the hip joint. J Clin Anesth, 52 : 83-9.
[15] Aydin ME,Borulu F,Ates I,Kara S .2020 .Ahiskalioglu A. A Novel Indication of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block: Surgical Anesthesia for Vein Ligation and Stripping. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 34(3) : 843-5.
[16] Ahiskalioglu A,Aydin ME,Ahiskalioglu EO,Tuncer K,Celik M. .2019 .Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for surgical anesthesia of medial thigh. J Clin Anesth, 59 : 42-3.
[17] Chandran R,Beh ZY,Tsai FC,Kuruppu SD,Lim JY SD .2018 .Peripheral nerve blocks for above knee amputation in high-risk patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 34(4) : 458-64.
[18] Krysa J,Fraser S,Saha P,Fuller M,Bell RE,Carrell TW .2012 .Quality improvement framework for major amputation: are we getting it right?. Int J Clin Pract, 66(12) : 1230-4.
[19] Del Buono R,Padua E,Pascarella G,Costa F,Tognù A,Terranova G .2021 .Pericapsular nerve group block: an overview. Minerva Anestesiol, 87(4) : 458-66.
[20] Pascarella G,Costa F,Del Buono R,Pulitanò R,Strumia A,Piliego C .2021 .Impact of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia and functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, observer-masked, controlled trial. Anaesthesia, 76(11) : 1492-8.
[21] Zheng J,Pan D,Zheng B,Ruan X. .2022 .Preoperative pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 47(3) : 155-60.
[22] Baddoo H .2009 .A preliminary report on the use of peripheral nerve blocks for lower limb amputations. Ghana Med, 43(1) : 24-8.
[23] Shamim F,Hameed M,Siddiqui N,Abbasi S. .2018 .Ultrasoundguided peripheral nerve blocks in high-risk patients, requiring lower limb (Above and below knee) amputation. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci, 8(2) : 100-3.
[24] Hussien AE,Abd Elhalim MAE .2020 .Comparison between ultrasound-guided sciatic-femoral nerve block and unilateral spinal anesthesia in below-knee amputation surgery. AIMJ, 4(2) : 36-9.
[25] Munirama S,McLeod G .2013 .Ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. BJA Education, 13(4) : 136-40.
[26] Katz J .2009 .Transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain: risk factors and protective factors. Expert Rev Neurother, 9(5) : 723-44.
[27] Andreae MH,Andreae DA .2013 .Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth, 111(5) : 711-20.
[28] Snyder GL,Greenberg S. .2010 .Effect of anaesthetic technique and other perioperative factors on cancer recurrence. Br J Anaesth, 105(2) : 106-15.
[29] Cata JP .2018 .Outcomes of regional anesthesia in cancer patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 31(5) : 593-600.
Citations
Citations are not available for this document.
0

Citations

0

Downloads

3

Views