The Histopathological Parameters Affecting Biochemical Recurrence in Radical Prostatectomies. | [Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP • 2017]

Author(s):

1. Yelda Dere: Department of Pathology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla, Turkey

2. Aysegul Aksoy Altinboga: Department of Pathology, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Department of Pathology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla, Turkey

3. Kaan Bal: Department of Urology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey

4. Aylin Calli: Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Department of Pathology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla, Turkey

5. Murat Ermete: Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Department of Pathology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla, Turkey

6. Aysegul Akder Sari: Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Department of Pathology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla, Turkey

Abstract:

Objective: To determine the relationship between biochemical recurrence and other histopathological factors in prostate cancer. Study Design: Analytical study. Place and Duration of Study: Pathology and Urology Departments, Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, between 2001 - 2013. Methodology: 117 cases diagnosed with prostatic adenocarcinoma and treated by radical prostatectomy were reviewed retrospectively for histopathological features; whereas, other prognostic findings were noted. PSA levels and many other histopathological parameters were assessed in order to put forth their effect on biochemical recurrence. Results: PSA level (p<0.001), tumor volume (p<0.001), Gleason score (p<0.001), extraprostatic extension (p<0.001), perineural invasion (p<0.001), ganglion involvement (p=0.040), vascular invasion (p<0.001), positive surgical margins (p<0.001), presence of tertiary pattern (p=0.004) and the involvement of the seminal vesicles (p<0.001) were found to be statistically related to the pathological stage. Age, perineural invasion, high grade tertiary pattern, intraluminal mucin, collagenous micronodules and foamy cytoplasmic changes were unrelated to recurrence. Conclusion: Histopathological features can be helpful in predicting prognosis in prostatic adenocarcinomas. However some of the histopathological factors such as intraluminal mucin and foamy cytoplasmic changes may not reflect high recurrence.

Page(s): 213-217

DOI: DOI not available

Published: Journal: Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP, Volume: 27, Issue: 4, Year: 2017

Keywords:

Keywords are not available for this article.

References:

[1] SiegelRL,MillerKD,JemalA, 2015.,CA Cancer J Clin 65 5 -29

[2] BuhmeidaA,PyrhönenS,LaatoM,CollanY., 2006.Prognostic factors in prostate cancer,Diag Path 1 4 -

[3] MontironiR,MazzucchelliM,ScarpelliM,Lopez-BeltranA,MıkuzG, 2005.Prostate carcinoma I: prognostic factors in radical prostatectomy specimens and pelvic lymph nodes,Bju Int 97 485 -91

[4] EpsteinJI,SrigleyJ,GrignonD,HumphreyP, 2007.Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma,Hum Pathol 38 1305 -9

[5] VickersAJ,CroninAM,BjörkT,ManjerJ,NilssonPM,DahlinA, 2010.Prostate specific antigen concentration at age 60 and death or metastasis from prostate cancer: Case-control study,BMJ 341 c4521 -

[6] SakrWA,WheelerTM,BluteM,BodoM,Calle-RodrigueR,HensonDE, 1996.Staging and reporting of prostate cancersampling of the radical prostatectomy specimen,Cancer 78 366 -8

[7] EichelbergerLE,KochMO,DaggyJK,UlbrightTM,EbleJN, 2003.Predicting tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients with prostate cancer,Am J Clin Pathol 120 386 -91

[8] NoiwanS,RattanarapeeS., 2011.Mucin production in prostatic adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study of 190 radical prostatectomy and/or core biopsy specimens in department of pathology, Siriraj Hospital,J Med Assoc Thai 94 224 -30

[9] FreedlandSJ,PrestiJC,KaneCJ,AronsonWJ,TerrisMK,DoreyF, 2004.Do younger men have better biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy,Urology 63 518 -22

[10] ItoK,NakashimaJ,MukaiM,AsakuraH,OhigashiT,SaitoS, 2003.Prognostic implication of microvascular invasion in biochemical failure in patients treated with radical prostatectomy,Urol Int 70 297 -302

[11] BaisdenBL,KahaneH,EpsteinJI, 1999.Perineural invasion, mucinous fibroplasia, and glomerulations: diagnostic features of limited cancer on prostate needle biopsy,Am J Surg Pathol 23 918 -924

[12] DemaA,TabanS,LazarE,BordaA,LazureanuC,HermanD, 2011.Pseudobenign prostate carcinomas: Causes of falsenegative biopsy results,Rom J Morphol Embryol 52 963 -74

[13] WarrickJI,HumphreyPA, 2013.Foamy gland carcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy: Incidence, gleason grade, and comparative a-Methylacyl-CoA Racemase vs,ERG Expression. Am J Surg Pathol 37 1709 -14

[14] BermanDM,YangJ,EpsteinJI, 2000.Foamy gland high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia,Am J Surg Pathol 24 140 -4

[15] ArangelovichV,TretiakovaM,SenGuptaE,KrauszT,YangXJ, 2003.Pathogenesis and significance of collagenous micronodules of the prostate,Appl Immunohisto M M 11 15 -9

[16] SakamotoN,HasegawaY,KogaH,KotohS,KuroiwaK,Naito S, 1999.Presence of ganglia within the prostatic capsule: Ganglion involvement in prostatic cancer,Prostate 40 167 -71

[17] MosseCA,Magi-GalluzziC,TsuzukiT,EpsteinJI, 2004.The prognostic significance of tertiary gleason pattern 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens,Am J Surg Pathol 28 394 -8

[18] VisAN,SchroderFH,Van der KwastTH, 2006.The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer,Eur Urol 50 258 -65

Citations

Downloads

Views