A review of Hemodynamic Response to the use of Different Types of Laryngoscopes. | [Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care • 2016]

Author(s):

1. Roopa Sachidananda DA DNB: Department of Anaesthesiology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka, India

2. Umesh G MD: Department of Anaesthesiology, Dharwad Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Sciences, Dharwad & Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Karnataka, India

3. Safiya I. Shaikh MD: Department of Anaesthesiology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka, India

Abstract:

Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard in airway management either as a means to administer general anesthesia or for mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients for protecting the airway when the airway reflexes are dysfunctional. Macintosh laryngoscope is the standard laryngoscope used for intubation though advances in science have resulted in development of laryngoscopes of different designs. The process of laryngoscopy and intubation (L&I) can result in significant hemodynamic response and this is a topic of debate and research in anesthesia. A comprehensive review of hemodynamic responses to various laryngoscope designs has been undertaken here. Tracheal intubation contributes to more hemodynamic response compared to laryngoscopy alone. The hemodynamic responses to L&I are exaggerated in the elderly and those with uncontrolled hypertension. Orotracheal intubation causes less hemodynamic response as compared to nasotracheal intubation. Laryngoscope design, duration of L&I and the forces applied on the laryngoscope all contribute to hemodynamic fluctuations. McCoy blade and videolaryngoscopes where L&I can be performed without the aid of stylets provide better attenuation of hemodynamic response compared to intubation using the Macintosh laryngoscope. Fibreoptic orotracheal intubation with the aid of combined lingual traction and jaw thrust maneuver provides superior attenuation of hemodynamic response compared to use of laryngoscope.

Page(s): 201-208

DOI: DOI not available

Published: Journal: Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, Year: 2016

Keywords:

Keywords are not available for this article.

References:

[1] LevitanRM,HeitzJW,SweeneyM,CooperRM, 2011.The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices,Ann Emerg Med 57 240 -247

[2] annemergmed.,SavoldelliGL,SchifferE,AbeggC,BaeriswylV,ClergueF,WaeberJL, 2010., 05 -

[3] x StoutDM,BishopMJ,DwerstegJF,CullenBF, 1987.Correlation of endotracheal tube size with sore throat and hoarseness following general anesthesia,Anesthesiology 67 419 -421

[4] SchommerNC,HelhammerDH,KirschbaumC, 2003.Dissociation between reactivity of the hypothalamus-pituitaryadrenal axis and the sympatheticadrenal-medullary system to repeated psychosocial stress,Psychosom Med 65 450 -460

[5] KingBD,HarrisLC,GreifensteinFE,ElderJD,DrippsRD, 1951.Reflex circulatory responses to direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation performed during general anesthesia,Anesthesiology 12 556 -566

[6] 1984.Sympathoadrenal responses to anaesthesia and surgery,Br J of Anaesth 56 725 -739

[7] TomoriZ,WiddicombeJG, 1969.Muscular, bronchomotor and cardiovascular reflexes elicited by mechanical stimulation of the respiratory tract,J Physiol 200 25a -49a

[8] BishopM J,RobertF Bedford, 1996.Airway management, Principles and Practice, 102 -117

[9] WycoffC, 1960.Endotracheal intubation;effects on blood pressure and pulse rate,Anaesthesiology 21 153 -157

[10] CorbettJL,KerrJH,Prys-RobertsC, 1969.Cramptonsmith A. Cardiovascular disturbances in severe tetanus due to over activity of the sympathetic nervous system,Anaesthesia 24 198 -210

[11] RusselWJ,MorrisRG,FrewinDB,DrewSE, 1981.Changes in plasma catecholamine concentrations during endotracheal intubation,Br J Anaesth 53 37 -39

[12] KayhanZ,AldemirD,MutluH,OgusE, 2005.Which is responsible for the hemodynamic response due to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation? Catecholamines, vasopressin or angiotensin?,Eur J Anaesthesiol 22 780 -785

[13] Low J M , Harey,Prys RobertsC,DaginoJ, 1986.Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension VII: Adrenergic responses to laryngoscopy,Br J Anaesth 58 471 -477

[14] RoyWL,EdelistG,GilbertB, 1979.Myocardial ischemia during non-cardiac surgical procedures in patients with coronary - artery disease,Anesthesiology 51 393 -397

[15] GalTJ, 2005.,Miller's Anesthesia 6thed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 1652 -

[16] DonlonJV,DoyleDJ,FeldmanMA, 2005.Anesthesia for eye, ear, nose and throat surgery In:Miller RD, ed,Miller's Anesthesia 6thed 2527 -2549

[17] BullingtonJ,Mouton PerrySM,RigbyJ,PinkertonM,RogersD,LewisTC, 1989.The effect of advancing age on the sympathetic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation,Anesthe Analg 68 603 -608

[18] BucxMJL,ScheckPAE,Van GeelRTM,Den OudenAH,NiesingR, 1992.Measurement of forces during laryngoscopy,Anaesthesia 47 348 -351

[19] BucxMJ,Van GeelRT,ScheckPA,StijnenT., 1992.Cardiovascular effects of forces applied during laryngoscopy,DOI: 10 47 2044 -1033

[20] NishiyamaT,HigashizawaT,BitoH,KonishiA,SakaiT., 1997.Which laryngoscope is the most stressful in laryngoscopy; Macintosh, Miller, or,McCoy? Masui 46 1519 -1524

[21] HaidryMA,KhanFA, 2013.Comparison of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes,J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 29 111710 -9185

[22] McCoyEP,MirakhurRK,McCloskey BV, 1995.A comparison of the stress response to laryngoscopy: the Macintosh versus the McCoy blade,DOI: 10 50 2044 -946

[23] GargS,SodhiBK,MohindraBK,TewariA,BhambriV,SharmaS., 2003.Changes in the haemodynamic responses : Conventional endotracheal intubation Vs intubation with intubating LMA,J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol 19 289 -294

[24] SenerEB,UstunE,UstunB,SarihasanB, 2012.Hemodynamic responses and upper airway morbidity following tracheal intubation in patients with hypertension: Conventional laryngoscopy versus intubating laryngeal mask airway,Clinics 67 08 -54

[25] KavithaJ,TripathyDK,MishraSK,MishraG,ChandrasekharLJ, 2011.Intubating condition, hemodynamic parameters and upper airway morbidity: A comparison of intubating laryngeal mask airway with standard direct laryngoscopy,Anesth Essays Res 5 84190 -1162

[26] VenkateshHK, 2004.Optimal combination of laryngoscopy and airway anaesthesia to minimize cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation,Journal Anaesth Clin Pharmacol 20 379 -386

[27] TongJL,AshworthDR,SmithJE, 2005.Cardiovascular responses following laryngoscope assisted, ifbreoptic orotracheal intubation,DOI: 10 04238 2044 -758

[28] AghdaiiN,AzarfarinR,YazdanianF,FaritusSZ, 2010.Cardiovascular responses to orotracheal intubation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Comparing ifberoptic bronchoscopy with direct laryngoscopy,Middle East J Anesthesiol 20 833 -838

[29] SinghS,SmithJE, 2003.Cardiovascular changes after the three stages of nasotracheal intubation,Br J Anaesth 91 667 -671

[30] SunDA,WarrinerCB,ParsonsDG,KleinR,UmedalyHS,MountM., 2005.The Glidescope Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients,Br J Anaesth 94 381 -4

[31] XueFS,ZhangGH,LiXY,SunHT,LiP,LiCW, 2007.Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope,J Clin Anesth 19 245 -250

[32] MalikMA,MaharajCH,HarteBH,LaffeyJG, 2008.Comparison of Macintosh, Trueview EVO2, Glidescope and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization,Br J Anaesth 101 723 -730

[33] SiddiquiN,KatznelsonR,FriedmanZ, 2009.Heart rate/blood pressure response and airway morbidity following tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy,GlideScope and Trachlight: a randomized control trial,Eur J Anaesthesiol 26 740 -745

[34] PournajafianAR,GhodratyMR,FaizSHR,RahimzadehP,GoodarzynejadH,Dogmehchi E. Comparing, 2014.Glidescope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope regarding hemodynamic responses during orotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial,Irans Red Crescent Med J 16 e12334 -

[35] DashtiM,AminiS,AzarfarinR,TotonchiZ,HatamiM., .Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation with Glidescope® video- laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertension,Res Cardiovasc Med 2014 May;3 -

[36] JeonWJ,KimKH,YeomJH,BangMR,HongJB,ChoSY, 2011.A comparison of the Glidescope® to the McGrath® videolaryngoscope in patients,Korean J Anesthesiol 61 19 -23

[37] SuzukiA,ToyamaY,KunisawaR,Sasaki S Hirota, 2008.The Pentax-AWS(R) rigid indirect videolaryngoscope: clinical assessment of performance in 320 cases,Anaesthesia 05452 2044 -647

[38] EnomotoY,AsaiT,KamishimaK,OkudaY.,Pentax-AWS, 2008.a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study,Br J Anaesth 100 544 -548

[39] MalikMA,MaharajCH,HarteBH,LaffeyJC, 2008.Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization,Br J Anaesth 101 723 -730

[40] MalikMA,SubramaniamR,ChurasiaS,MaharajCH,HarteBH,LaffeyJG, 2009.Tracheal intubationin patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of the Airwayscope, LMA C trach and the Macintosh laryngoscopes,Br J Anaesth 102 654 -661

[41] KoyamaJ,AoyaaT,KusanoY,SeguchiT,KawagishiK,IwashitaT, 2006.Description and first clinical application of Airway Scope for tracheal intubation,J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 18 247 -250

[42] Lee H. The, 2013.Pentax airway scope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: Comparison of hemodynamic responses and concentrations of plasma norepinephrine to tracheal intubation,Korean J Anesthesiol 64 315 -320

[43] WooCH,KimSH,ParkJY,BaeJY,KwakIS,MunSH, 2012.Macintosh laryngoscope vs pentax-AWS video laryngoscope: comparison of efficacy and cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation in major burns patients,Korean J Anesthesiol 62 119 -124

[44] KanchiM,NairHC,BanakalS,MurthyK,MurugesanC, 2011.Haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation in coronary artery disease: Direct versus videolaryngoscopy,Indian J Anaesth 55 82673 -5049

[45] KoDD,KangH,YangSY,ShinHY,BaekCW,JungYH, 2012.A comparison of hemodynamic changes after endotracheal intubation by the Optiscope(TM) and the conventional laryngoscope,doi: 10 63 130 -135

[46] SchalteG,ScheidU,RexS,CoburnM,FiedlerB,RossaintR, 2011.The use of the Airtraq ® optical laryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation in high-risk cardio-surgical patients,BMC Research Notes 4 1756 -

[47] KohJC,LeeJS,LeeYW,ChangCH, 2010.Comparison of the laryngeal view during intubation using Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization and mouth opening limitation,Korean J Anesthesiol 59 314 -318

[48] KitamuraT,YamadaY,DuHL,HanaokaK., .Efficiency of a new fibreoptic stylet scope in the tracheal intubation,Anesthesiology1999 91 1628 -1632

[49] KitamuraT,YamadaY,ChinzeiM,DuHL,HanaokaK., 2001.Attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation by the StyletScope,Br J Anaesth 86 275 -277

[50] SarkilarG,SarginM,SaritasTB,BorazanH,GokF,KilicaslanA,OtelciogluS., 2015.Hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation performed with video and direct laryngoscopy in patients scheduled for major cardiac surgery,Int J Clin Exp Med 8 11477 -11483

[51] BagSK,Hemanth KumarVR,KrishnaveniN,RavishankarM,VelrajJ,AruloliM., 2014.A comparative study between Truview PCD laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in viewing glottis opening and ease of intubation: A crossover study,Anesth Essays Res 8 143152 -1162

[52] AriciS,KaramanS,DogruS,KaramanT,TaparH,OzsoyAZ, 2014.The McGrath series 5 video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized trial in obstetric patients,Turk J Med Sci 44 387 -392

[53] GuptaA,SwethaHR, 2016.Comparison between Macintosh laryngoscope and McGrath videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in neurosurgical patients,J Evid Based Med Healthc 3 1046 -1055

[54] TempeDK,ChaudharyK,DiwakarA,DattV,VirmaniS,MohandasA, 2016.Comparison of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation with Truview PCD TM, McGrath® and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized prospective study,Ann Card Anaesth 19 173023 -9784

[55] JakusenkoN,KopeikaU,MihelsonsM,NagobadeD,PutninaAV,PavarsA, 2008.Comparison of stress response performing endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy, fibreoptic intubation and intubation by the GlideScope laryngoscope,Proceedings of the Latvian Acad Sci. Section B. Natural, Exact and applied 62 176 -181

[56] TsaiP,ChenB, 2009.Hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation comparing the Airway Scope®, Glidescope®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes,The internet Journal of Anesthesiology -

[57] MaassenRL,PietersBM,MaathuisB,SerroyenJ,MarcusMA, 2012.Endotracheal intubation using videolaryngoscopy causes less cardiovascular response compared to classic direct laryngoscopy, in cardiac patients according a standard hospital protocol,Acta Anaesthsiol Belg 63 181 -186

[58] GuptaK,GirdharKK,AnandR,MajgiMS,GuptaPS,GuptaPB, 2012.Comparison of haemodynamic response to intubation: Flexible ifbreoptic bronchoscope versus bonfils rigid intubation endoscope,Indian J Anaesth 56 100816 -5049

[59] TomaszGaszynski,ArticleID, 2014.A Comparison of Performance of Endotracheal Intubation Using the Levitan FPS Optical Stylet or Lary-Flex Videolaryngoscope in Morbidly Obese Patients,”,The Scientific World Journal -

Citations

Downloads

Views