Pakistan Science Abstracts
Article details & metrics
No Detail Found!!
A comparative Study to Assess the effect of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as An Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
Author(s):
1. Mohammed Kazim: Department of Anesthesiology, Malabar Medical College, Kozhikode, India
2. Varsha Kothari: Department of Anesthesiology, Malabar Medical College, Kozhikode, India
3. Shivam Priyadarshi: SMS Medical College, Jaipur, India
4. Tuhin Mistry: Department of Anesthesiology, AIIMS, Raipur, India
5. Rajeev Prajapati: Department of Anesthesiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, India
6. Rajni Mathur: Department of Anesthesiology, Malabar Medical College, Kozhikode, India
Abstract:
Aims and Background: To prolong postoperative analgesia many adjuvants has been used opioids and alpha-2 agonists are very popular among them. This study was aimed at comparing the sensory, motor, hemodynamic, sedative and analgesic properties of epidural administration of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine. Methodology: With Institutional ethical committee clearance this study was conducted at our hospital. After obtaining informed and written consent, a total of 60 patients scheduled for elective percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were randomly allocated into two groups of 30 each. Patients of both genders, aged 21-60 y, ASA physical status I and II were enrolled. Group RD received 28 ml of inj ropivacaine 0.5% + dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg and Group RF received 28 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% + inj fentanyl 1 µg/kg epidurally. Hemodynamic parameters, sedation scores, and time to onset of sensory loss, complete motor blockade, two segmental dermatomal regression and time of first rescue analgesic were recorded. Data were compiled systematically and analyzed using unpaired t-test, Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The demographic profile of patients was comparable in both groups. Onset of sensory analgesia up to T10 was 6.8 ± 2.8 min vs. 8.7 ± 2.7 min and time to reach maximum motor block was 19.8 ± 5.8 min vs. 23.9 ± 4.9 min in Group RD and Group RF respectively, which was significantly less in the Group RD. Postoperative analgesia was significantly prolonged in the Group RF as compared to Group RD, e.g. 394.5 ± 36.5 vs. 268.5 ± 28.3 min respectively. Sedation scores were better in the Group RD and highly significant on statistical comparison (P < 0.001). Incidence of hypotension, nausea and vomiting was high in the Group RF, while incidence of dry mouth was higher in the Group RD. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is a better adjuvant than fentanyl when added to epidural ropivacaine in terms of early onset of sensory and motor block, prolonged postoperative analgesia and better sedation with less side effects.
Page(s): 59-64
DOI: DOI not available
Published: Journal: Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care, Volume: 21, Issue: 1, Year: 2017
Keywords:
Keywords are not available for this article.
References:
[1] AravantinosE,KaratzasA,GravasS,TzortzisV,MelekosM., 2007.Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under assisted local anaesthesia: a prospective study on selected patients with upper urinary tract obstruction,Eur Urol 51 224 -7
[2] KumawatT,KothariV,PriyadarshiS,MistryT,MorwalS., 2016.Study comparing the efficacy and safety of epidural anesthesia versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy,Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol 9 353 -357
[3] Anesthesiology, ., 91 388 -96
[4] AnesthAnalg, 2004., 98 153 -8
[5] Sarvana BabuMS,VermaAK,AgarwalA,TyagiCM,UpadhyayM,Tripathi S,SinghV,SinhaRJ,SankhwarSN,MalikA, 2011.A prospective randomized study comparing percutaneous nephrolithotomy under combined spinalepidural anesthesia with percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia,Urol Int 10 293 -8
[6] OzalpG,GunerF,KuruN,KadiogullariN., 1998.Postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia with opioid bupivacaine mixtures,Can J Anaesth 45 938 -42
[7] BakshiU,ChatterjeeS,SenguptaS,GuptaD.,Adjuvant Drugs In Central Neuraxial Analgesia- A Review. The Internet J Anesthesiol, 2009., 26 -
[8] BajwaSJ,AroraV,KaurJ,SinghA,ParmarSS, 2011.Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl for epidural analgesia in lower limb orthopedic surgeries,Saudi J Anesth 10 87264 -354X
[9] ThimmappaM,MadhusudhanaR,Karthick, .D comparative study of epidural ropivacaine 0.75% alone with ropivacaine plus clonidine and Ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine for lower Abdominal and lower limb surgeries,World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2014 3 1218 -30
[10] KaurJ,BajwaSJ, 2014.Comparison of epidural butorphanol and fentanyl as adjuvants in the lower abdominal surgery: A randomized clinical study,Saudi J Anaesth 8 130687 -354X
[11] AantaaR,KantoJ,ScheininM,KallioA,ScheininH.,Dexmedetomedine, .an alpha 2- adrenoreceptor agonist, reduces anaesthetic requirements for patients undergoing minor gynaecologic surgery,Anaesthesiology 73 230 -5
[12] CoskunerI,TekinM,KatiI,YagmurS,ElcicekK., 2007.Effects of dexmedetomedine on duration of anaesthesia and wakefulness in bupivacaine epidural block,Eur J Anaesthesiol 24 535 -40
[13] ArianSR,RuehlowRM,UhrichTD,EbertTJ, 2004.The efficacy of dexmedetomedine versus morphine for post operative analgesia after major inpatient surgery,Anesth Analg 98 153 -8
[14] BhawanaRastogi, 2015.Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to epidural 0.75% ropivacaine in patients undergoing infraumbilical surgery: A Clinical Study,Glob Anaesth Perioper Med 1 19 -23
[15] GuptaK,RastogiB,GuptaPK,JainM,GuptaS,ManglaD., 2014.Epidural 0.5% levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl for vaginal hysterectomy: A prospective study,Indian J Pain 28 149 -54
[16] Sarvana BabuM,VermaAK,AgarwalA,TyagiCM,UpadhyayM,Tripathi S, 2013.A comparative study in the postoperative spine surgeries: Epidural ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine with clonidine for post - operative analgesia,Indian J Anaesth 10 118563 -5049
[17] NeogiM,BhattacharjeeDP,DawnS,ChatterjeeN., 2010.A comparative study between clonidine and dexmedetomidine used as adjuncts to ropivacaine for caudal analgesia in paediatric patients,J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 26 149 -53
[18] GehlingM,TrybaM. Risks, .and side effects of intrathecal morphine combined with spinal anaesthesia:a meta-analysis,Anaesthesia 64 643 -51
Citations
Citations are not available for this document.
0

Citations

0

Downloads

3

Views