Pakistan Science Abstracts
Article details & metrics
No Detail Found!!
The Impact of the method of gunshot injury: War injuries vs. stray bullets vs. civilian fighting.
Author(s):
1. Salah Mansor: Faculty of Medicine, Libyan International Medical University, Benghazi, Libya; Department of General Surgery, Al-Jalaa Teaching Hospital, Benghazi, Libya
2. Zuhir Bodalal: Faculty of Medicine, Libyan International Medical University, Benghazi, Libya
Abstract:
Objective: To analyze the impact of the method of Gunshot Injury (GSI) (i.e. war injuries, stray bullets, and civilian fighting) on patient morbidity and mortality. Study Design: An observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Biostatistics Department of Al-Jalaa Hospital in Benghazi, Libya, from January to December 2011. Methodology: Patients’ records were analyzed with the method of gunshot injury as a classifying/comparative parameter. Age, gender, site of injury, receiving department, ICU admission, city of origin, length of stay, morbidity and mortality were determined and compared between the different methods of GSI. Results: During the conflict, 1761 gunshot injuries were treated at the hospital. The method of injury was recorded for 62% (n=1096) of the cases and were classified under war injuries (72.2%, n=791), stray bullets (14.1%, n=155), and civilian fighting (13.7%, n=150). Nearly all the patients being treated for civilian fighting (98%, n=147) were males, (stray bullets, 82.6%, n=128, and war injuries 98.4%, n=778). Women were significantly less involved in a war injury (1.6%, n=13, p
Page(s): 281-285
DOI: DOI not available
Published: Journal: Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP, Volume: 25, Issue: 4, Year: 2015
Keywords:
Keywords are not available for this article.
References:
References are not available for this document.
Citations
Citations are not available for this document.
0

Citations

0

Downloads

2

Views